|   | 
Details
   web
Records
Author König, H.J.; Helming, K.; Seddaiu, G.; Kipling, R.; Köchy, M.; Graversgaard, M.; van den Pol-van Dasselaar, A.; Nguyen, T.P.L.; Quaranta, G.; Salvia, R.; Sieber, S.; Ithes, S.; Kjeldsen, C.; Turner, K.G.; Dalgaard, T.; Roggero, P.P.
Title Stakeholder participation in agricultural research: Who should be involved, why, and how? Type Manuscript
Year Publication Abbreviated Journal
Volume Issue Pages
Keywords
Abstract Research in sustainable agricultural management requires appropriate participatory processes and tools enabling efficient dialogue and cooperation to allow researchers and stakeholders to co-produce knowledge. Research approaches that encourage stakeholder participation are in high demand because they allow a better understanding of human-nature interactions and interdependencies between actors. Participatory approaches also support multiple goals of agricultural management: improved productivity, food security, climate change adaptation, environmental conservation, rural development and policy decision making. Approaches to stakeholder engagement in the field of agricultural management research are manifold. Therefore, selecting the “right” approach depends on the specific purpose and contextualized issues at stake. We analyzed ten stakeholder approaches and propose a new framework with which to identify and select appropriate approaches for stakeholder engagement. The framework consists of three components: whom to engage (i.e., stakeholder type and mandate), why to engage (i.e., research purpose: consult, inform, collaborate), and how to engage (i.e., different methodological approaches). We identified different stakeholder groups (who?): farmers, agricultural actors, land users, and policymakers; different purposes (why?): facilitate engagement process, inform stakeholders, and obtain stakeholder perceptions; and different types of engagement methods (how?): participatory field experiments, desk simulations, interviews, panel discussions and different types of workshops. The framework was applied to arrange these approaches, organize them to improve understanding of their main strengths, weaknesses and supports for identifying and selecting an appropriate approach. We conclude that understanding the different facets of available approaches is crucial for selecting an appropriate stakeholder engagement approach. ;
Address
Corporate Author Thesis
Publisher Place of Publication Editor
Language (down) Summary Language Original Title
Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title
Series Volume Series Issue Edition
ISSN ISBN Medium
Area Expedition Conference
Notes Approved no
Call Number MA @ admin @ Serial 2564
Permanent link to this record
 

 
Author Kipling, P.; Saetnan, R.; van den Pol-van Dasselaar, A.; Scollan, D.; Bartley, D.; Bellocchi, G.; Hutchings, J.; Dalgaard, T.
Title Modelling interactions between climate and livestock pathogen transmission, Pirbright Institute, UK Type Conference Article
Year 2014 Publication Abbreviated Journal
Volume Issue Pages
Keywords LiveM
Abstract
Address
Corporate Author Thesis
Publisher Place of Publication Editor
Language (down) Summary Language Original Title
Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title
Series Volume Series Issue Edition
ISSN ISBN Medium
Area Expedition Conference Workshop: Modelling interactions between climate and livestock pathogen transmission, 2014-01-22 to 2014-01-22
Notes Approved no
Call Number MA @ admin @ Serial 2534
Permanent link to this record
 

 
Author Kipling, P.; Saetnan, E.; Scollan, D.; Bartley, D.; Bellocchi, G.; Hutchings, J.; Dalgaard, T.; van den Pol-van Dasselaar, A.
Title Modelling livestock and grassland systems under climate change Type Conference Article
Year 2014 Publication Abbreviated Journal
Volume Issue Pages
Keywords LiveM
Abstract
Address
Corporate Author Thesis
Publisher Place of Publication Editor
Language (down) Summary Language Original Title
Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title
Series Volume Series Issue Edition
ISSN ISBN Medium
Area Expedition Conference 25th EGF General Meeting on “EGF at 50: The Future of European Grasslands”. - Grassland Science in Europe 19. Aberystwyth, Wales : EGF, 2014 - p. 61 - 74., 2014-09-07 to 2014-09-11
Notes Approved no
Call Number MA @ admin @ Serial 2535
Permanent link to this record
 

 
Author Dalgaard, T.; Kjeldsen, C.; Meyer-Aurich, A.; Özkan, S.; Rolinski, S.; Köchy, M.; Olesen, J.E.; Brouwer, F.; van den Pol-van Dasselaar, A.; Kipling, R.
Title Farming systems models for regional scale impact assessment in Europe – case studies of N-losses and greenhouse gas emissions Type Conference Article
Year 2014 Publication Abbreviated Journal
Volume Issue Pages
Keywords LiveM
Abstract
Address
Corporate Author Thesis
Publisher Place of Publication Editor
Language (down) Summary Language Original Title
Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title
Series Volume Series Issue Edition
ISSN ISBN Medium
Area Expedition Conference Scaling in global, regional and farm models, 2014-09-24 to 2014-09-24
Notes Approved no
Call Number MA @ admin @ Serial 2380
Permanent link to this record
 

 
Author Dalgaard, T.
Title Models for regional scale farming system evaluation of climate change mitigation options and environmental impact assessment Type
Year 2015 Publication FACCE MACSUR Reports Abbreviated Journal
Volume 5 Issue Pages Sp5-15
Keywords
Abstract The aim of the present paper is to exemplify and discuss the importance of farm scale modeling in relation to The EU Joint Programming Initiative (JPI-FACCE) knowledge hub on Agriculture, Food Security and Climate Change project.In particular, livestock production systems include complex interactions, with non-linear relationships between input factors, production, emissions, local climate as well as natural resources (e.g. soil types, rotational land versus permanent grasslands etc.). Moreover, management options pursued by the different types of farmers and other relevant decision makers are important to integrate. Consequently, results of regional scale impact assessments depend on the farming systems model approach, the approach to upscale results, and the inclusion of the relevant stakeholders and decision makers at the scales considered.Different farming systems models are reviewed, including the existing dynamic and static biophysical models. Finally, procedures for upscaling and validity testing of synthesized model results at regional scales are presented. Based on a discussion of these procedures, recommendations for hot-spot analyses in farming systems with regard to integrated climate change adaptation and mitigation for a sustainable food production are synthesized, and the potentials for integration of recommended policies and farm management options into overarching models in order to assess their impact on the regional to global scales are discussed. No Label
Address
Corporate Author Thesis
Publisher Place of Publication Editor
Language (down) Summary Language Original Title
Series Editor Series Title Abbreviated Series Title
Series Volume Series Issue Edition
ISSN ISBN Medium
Area Expedition Conference MACSUR Science Conference 2015 »Integrated Climate Risk Assessment in Agriculture & Food«, 8–9+10 April 2015, Reading, UK
Notes Approved no
Call Number MA @ admin @ Serial 2130
Permanent link to this record