|
|
Kersebaum, K., & C. (2015). Model intercomparison for calibrated models (Vol. 4).
Abstract: The study ROTATIONEFFECT aims to compare the output of different models simulating field data sets with multi-year crop rotations including different treatments.Within the first Step (1a2a) data sets (comprising a total of 301 crop growth seasons) for 5 locations in Europe were distributed to 15 interested modeller groups.For this step only minimal information for calibration were provided to the modellers. In total 15 modelling teams sent their “uncalibrated” results as single-year calculations and/or continuous calculations of rotation depending on the capability of the model. Results have been evaluated and the paper submitted (European Journal of Agronomy).Now, within the 2nd step (1b2b) modellers were provided with more information on the crop for the calibration of models. Again, results of calibrated runs were collected.6 models were capable to run the rotations as continuous runs and another set of 6 models provided single year simulations.A first overview of the improvement of predictions due to calibration has been produced. Result files have been uploaded to the web platform for CropM results at Aarhus University (Work package C2 – data management). No Label
|
|
|
|
Steen, M. (2015). Warmer, Wetter, Wilder? Climatic Evidence from the Grain Markets (Vol. 4).
|
|
|
|
Sinabell, F. (2015). Integrated assessment of policy and climate change impacts: A case study on protein crop production in Austria (Vol. 4).
|
|
|
|
Severini, S. (2015). How volatile are farm incomes? The case of Italian farms (Vol. 4).
|
|
|
|
Shechter, M. (2015). The eocnomic impact of water scarcity under diverse water qualities and desalination policies (Vol. 4).
|
|
